|
Saudis press United States to put an
end to rate cuts
Irwin Stelzer, The Sunday Times,
business.timesonline.co.uk
06/29/08
But...The members of the Fed family
who worry most about the stability of
the banking system saw meltdown in
America’s future if all this talk of
interest-rate increases persisted.
The Saudis have now extended their
influence over oil prices to American
monetary policy. If another reason for
America’s politicians to end what Bush
calls the nation’s addiction to oil is
needed, surely this is it.
So the Federal Reserve Board’s
monetary policy committee
(technically, the Federal Open Market
Committee, or FOMC) has decided to
leave interest rates as they are -
which is far less important than how
it arrived at that decision. What
follows is a combination of hard fact
and my own surmise, mixed together so
as to shield the usual highly placed,
reliable source.
There is something called “the Fed
family”. It’s not as shady as a mafia
family, but far more powerful. Members
include chairman Ben Bernanke and the
six other members of the board of
governors, appointed by the president;
the presidents of the 12 regional Fed
banks, five of whom serve on the FOMC;
and several influential alumni who are
frequently consulted by Bernanke and
the White House, and whose public
utterances Bernanke cannot ignore.
In times like these - when recession
looms, inflationary pressures are
rising, and a lot of banks are, er,
teeter-tottering - many of the family
members weigh the several dangers
differently. Some worry about rising
unemployment, and want to keep
interest rates low. Some worry more
about inflation, and want to raise
rates. Others worry about the health -
or lack of it - of the banks, and
favour the sort of open-handed policy
that Bernanke has adopted to provide
liquidity to the banks. Still others
worry that bank bail-outs will create
the moral hazard that the Bank of
England’s Mervyn King so fears, and
produce even more reckless lending
behaviour. Gone are the good old days
when benign economic conditions led to
virtual unanimity of views.
So far, so obvious. But two things are
not so obvious. The first is the
intensity of the battle within the Fed
family. That has an advantage:
Bernanke benefits from a wide range of
views, which he says he welcomes. The
board of governors generally worries
most about the soundness of the
banking system. The presidents of the
regional banks, selected by local
businessmen and bankers, generally
worry more about inflation than
anything else, which is why the
presidents of five Fed regional banks
have opposed recent rate cuts. The
members of the FOMC worry about
everything. And the alumni sit on the
sidelines, rather like inlaws, sniping
or supporting the chairman, depending
on their view of each of his actions.
Not a bad system, even if it is a bit
messy.
Enter Treasury secretary Hank Paulson,
the Saudis, and the White House.
Someone has to find customers for the
billions in Treasury IOUs that result
from our ongoing federal budget
deficits. That’s Paulson’s job, making
him the nation’s No 1 bond salesman.
The Saudis are among his most
important customers. But the decline
in the value of the dollar is steadily
reducing the value of the
dollar-denominated bonds they hold.
So Paulson decided to go to Riyadh
late last month to soothe some ruffled
royal feathers. Reliable sources say
that the Saudis “hinted, as is their
style” that if America wants more oil,
it should do something to shore up the
dollar. Not unreasonable: the falling
dollar reduces the purchasing power of
the bits of paper the world uses to
pay for oil.
Paulson brought that message back, got
President George Bush and
Vice-President Dick Cheney to agree,
and started talking up the dollar.
Independently, or perhaps not so
independently, Bernanke let drop a
clue that further interest-rate cuts
are not now on the cards. As the Left
is wont to say, it is no coincidence
that the Saudis followed by announcing
several increases in oil production.
But the story doesn’t end there.
Higher interest rates not only boost
the dollar, they make it more
expensive for the banks to raise the
new capital they desperately need.
Bank shares plummeted. The members of
the Fed family who worry most about
the stability of the banking system
saw meltdown in America’s future if
all this talk of interest-rate
increases persisted. Timothy
Geithner, as president of the New York
Fed the man closest to financial
markets, undoubtedly pressed for an
end to all this talk of raising
interest rates.
So here we are. Paulson, with the
backing of Bush, pacified the Saudis
by promising to support the dollar. He
could have done that by direct
intervention in the currency markets -
a power possessed by the Treasury, not
the Fed. But Paulson probably knows
that such interventions rarely succeed
in “fighting the market”, and so
confined himself to jaw-boning.
In return for talking up the dollar,
and putting an added strain on the
banking system, he got a bit more oil,
mostly of the sour, heavy sort for
which there is no available refining
capacity. The Fed had to make sure
that things did not go from bad to
worse for the banks, even if that
meant not hinting at the
dollar-boosting interest-rate increase
that the Saudis are looking for. So in
last week’s statement the FOMC
indicated that it is worried about
inflation, but “expects inflation to
moderate later this year and next
year”. No interest-rate increase
needed, at least unless the inflation
indicators head towards the sky.
The ball is back in Paulson’s court.
He has to decide whether his
commitment to the Saudis now requires
him to start buying dollars to prevent
a further decline in the greenback. Or
he could try to persuade his royal
customers, who kept their end of the
bargain, that merely by threatening
intervention he was strengthening the
dollar.
This is the stuff of which good novels
are made. But it is not fiction.
The Saudis have now extended their
influence over oil prices to American
monetary policy. If another reason for
America’s politicians to end what Bush
calls the nation’s addiction to oil is
needed, surely this is it.
|